Module 01
Participant Events & Incident Management
Flags potential reportable incidents based on your configured definitions, prompts for missing required fields and tracks follow-ups and corrective actions.
James is Curki's dedicated regulatory and incident compliance associate. It continuously reviews incident logs, complaints and shift notes to detect unreported risks, check documentation against NDIS and aged care standards, and generate audit-ready evidence for investigations, governance and funding reviews.

Watch the walkthrough, then get set up in four steps. Connections are API-first and read-only by default, and most teams connect a system in about 3 minutes once credentials are ready.
Sign up at Curki.ai and verify your email.
Paste an API key or complete OAuth for your progress notes system and incident or risk register, plus complaints if you want them. Read-only is recommended.
Set incident categories and severity levels, reportable definitions, corrective action fields and who is alerted when.
Open Incident Management & Auditing. New notes and incidents are reviewed on each refresh, with Needs Review alerts and unreported incident candidates.
Stuck on scopes or ID mapping? Book a free 30-minute session and our product experts will onboard you end to end. Book a walkthrough
Compliance managers sample notes, chase incomplete incidents and reconstruct timelines by hand. Incidents get missed until families complain or audits find gaps, and corrective actions are inconsistent.
James flags potential reportables, missing follow-ups and unreported incidents automatically. You get a ready-to-review timeline, a draft evidence summary and corrective action prompts, so your team stays proactive, not reactive.
“Don't wait for an audit to find your gaps. Let AI audit everything, all the time, and give your team only the exceptions worth reviewing.”
For example, a fall mentioned in a progress note with no formal incident created.
Weeks of note-hunting become a clear, chronological timeline of who, what and when.
Risk trends by participant, house or site, shift type, day and time, and staff cohort.
Early warning signals like behavioural triggers, medication refusals and repeated near-misses.
Identify documentation gaps and training needs. System improvement, not blame.
Every record reviewed, not a 5–10% sample, with human review where it matters.
Module 01
Flags potential reportable incidents based on your configured definitions, prompts for missing required fields and tracks follow-ups and corrective actions.
Module 02
Cross-checks shift notes against the incident register, surfaces risk patterns and assembles evidence summaries and timelines for audits and reviews.
What James can do for your team.
01
Cross-checks shift and progress notes against the incident register for events that were never recorded.
05
Detects trends in falls, medication refusal, behaviours of concern and skin integrity by participant, site and time.
09
Trend summaries and risk heatmaps for governance packs.
02
Prompts for missing required fields: time, location, immediate actions, witnesses and escalation.
06
Flags language that may indicate restrictive practices for review against your policy.
03
Collates relevant notes into a structured narrative of who, what, when, impact and actions.
07
Connects complaint themes with incident patterns to separate systemic issues from isolated events.
04
Builds a chronological timeline across notes, incidents, communications and actions.
08
Spots repeated gaps like missing detail, late notes or missing immediate actions to inform coaching.
Group 1 of 3
Scenario 01
A worker writes “client slipped in shower” in shift notes. James finds no matching incident entry and alerts the quality manager to review and lodge appropriately.
Scenario 02
For a plan review, James scans a defined period and compiles a structured chronology of behaviours, risks, escalation and interventions, ready for internal review.
Scenario 03
Skin tears spike on weekends at one house. James highlights the trend so you can investigate staffing mix, handover quality, hazards or training gaps.
“The note says ‘client was upset’, but there are indicators of verbal aggression. Do you want this flagged as a potential behavioural incident for review?”
“Incident #123 has no follow-up date or immediate action recorded. This may block closure. Please add before finalising.”
James flags potential risks and asks for confirmation rather than asserting conclusions.
It prepares drafts and checks completeness. A person reviews and submits to external portals.
Highlights compliance risks but doesn't determine liability.
Flags symptoms and keywords; never diagnoses medical causes.
If information is missing, James asks for it.
Quality and compliance managers, operations managers, team leaders and CEOs of NDIS and aged care providers (typically 20+ participants) who need audit-ready governance and time-bound incident control.
Providers with paper-only shift notes and incident logs, or organisations unwilling to standardise incident workflows.
No. It audits and augments your existing system, linking incident records with shift notes and related evidence so your team can act faster and more consistently.
It scans shift notes for incident indicators such as falls, injuries, aggression, medication refusal or ambulance attendance, and checks whether a matching entry exists in your incident register.
No. It helps you prepare and validate the content, but submission always remains a human-controlled step.
Yes. Definitions, keywords, severity thresholds and required fields can be configured to match your governance framework.
It can support SIRS-style categorisation and prompts where configured. We'll confirm your exact decision-tree requirements during onboarding.
Items are flagged as “needs review” and James asks for clarification rather than auto-labelling. You can tune the rules over time.
Yes. If voice-generated notes are stored in your connected system, James audits them like any other shift note.
Yes. It normalises and structures text for detection and summarisation, then asks for missing details where needed.

Documentation Associate
Turns spoken updates into structured, professional notes in seconds.

HR Associate
Your AI HR manager. Runs hiring to onboarding as one conversation.

CFO Associate
Your digital CFO. Shows exactly where money is leaking and what to fix.

Rostering Associate
Always-on rostering assistant that fills shift gaps in minutes, not hours.
1 / 4
Book a 30-minute walkthrough. Our product experts will look at your stack, confirm which connectors are live and set up James with you.
James is Curki's dedicated regulatory and incident compliance associate. It continuously reviews incident logs, complaints and shift notes to detect unreported risks, check documentation against NDIS and aged care standards, and generate audit-ready evidence for investigations, governance and funding reviews.

Watch the walkthrough, then get set up in four steps. Connections are API-first and read-only by default, and most teams connect a system in about 3 minutes once credentials are ready.
Sign up at Curki.ai and verify your email.
Paste an API key or complete OAuth for your progress notes system and incident or risk register, plus complaints if you want them. Read-only is recommended.
Set incident categories and severity levels, reportable definitions, corrective action fields and who is alerted when.
Open Incident Management & Auditing. New notes and incidents are reviewed on each refresh, with Needs Review alerts and unreported incident candidates.
Stuck on scopes or ID mapping? Book a free 30-minute session and our product experts will onboard you end to end. Book a walkthrough
Compliance managers sample notes, chase incomplete incidents and reconstruct timelines by hand. Incidents get missed until families complain or audits find gaps, and corrective actions are inconsistent.
James flags potential reportables, missing follow-ups and unreported incidents automatically. You get a ready-to-review timeline, a draft evidence summary and corrective action prompts, so your team stays proactive, not reactive.
“Don't wait for an audit to find your gaps. Let AI audit everything, all the time, and give your team only the exceptions worth reviewing.”
For example, a fall mentioned in a progress note with no formal incident created.
Weeks of note-hunting become a clear, chronological timeline of who, what and when.
Risk trends by participant, house or site, shift type, day and time, and staff cohort.
Early warning signals like behavioural triggers, medication refusals and repeated near-misses.
Identify documentation gaps and training needs. System improvement, not blame.
Every record reviewed, not a 5–10% sample, with human review where it matters.
Module 01
Flags potential reportable incidents based on your configured definitions, prompts for missing required fields and tracks follow-ups and corrective actions.
Module 02
Cross-checks shift notes against the incident register, surfaces risk patterns and assembles evidence summaries and timelines for audits and reviews.
What James can do for your team.
01
Cross-checks shift and progress notes against the incident register for events that were never recorded.
05
Detects trends in falls, medication refusal, behaviours of concern and skin integrity by participant, site and time.
09
Trend summaries and risk heatmaps for governance packs.
02
Prompts for missing required fields: time, location, immediate actions, witnesses and escalation.
06
Flags language that may indicate restrictive practices for review against your policy.
03
Collates relevant notes into a structured narrative of who, what, when, impact and actions.
07
Connects complaint themes with incident patterns to separate systemic issues from isolated events.
04
Builds a chronological timeline across notes, incidents, communications and actions.
08
Spots repeated gaps like missing detail, late notes or missing immediate actions to inform coaching.
Group 1 of 3
Scenario 01
A worker writes “client slipped in shower” in shift notes. James finds no matching incident entry and alerts the quality manager to review and lodge appropriately.
Scenario 02
For a plan review, James scans a defined period and compiles a structured chronology of behaviours, risks, escalation and interventions, ready for internal review.
Scenario 03
Skin tears spike on weekends at one house. James highlights the trend so you can investigate staffing mix, handover quality, hazards or training gaps.
“The note says ‘client was upset’, but there are indicators of verbal aggression. Do you want this flagged as a potential behavioural incident for review?”
“Incident #123 has no follow-up date or immediate action recorded. This may block closure. Please add before finalising.”
James flags potential risks and asks for confirmation rather than asserting conclusions.
It prepares drafts and checks completeness. A person reviews and submits to external portals.
Highlights compliance risks but doesn't determine liability.
Flags symptoms and keywords; never diagnoses medical causes.
If information is missing, James asks for it.
Quality and compliance managers, operations managers, team leaders and CEOs of NDIS and aged care providers (typically 20+ participants) who need audit-ready governance and time-bound incident control.
Providers with paper-only shift notes and incident logs, or organisations unwilling to standardise incident workflows.
No. It audits and augments your existing system, linking incident records with shift notes and related evidence so your team can act faster and more consistently.
It scans shift notes for incident indicators such as falls, injuries, aggression, medication refusal or ambulance attendance, and checks whether a matching entry exists in your incident register.
No. It helps you prepare and validate the content, but submission always remains a human-controlled step.
Yes. Definitions, keywords, severity thresholds and required fields can be configured to match your governance framework.
It can support SIRS-style categorisation and prompts where configured. We'll confirm your exact decision-tree requirements during onboarding.
Items are flagged as “needs review” and James asks for clarification rather than auto-labelling. You can tune the rules over time.
Yes. If voice-generated notes are stored in your connected system, James audits them like any other shift note.
Yes. It normalises and structures text for detection and summarisation, then asks for missing details where needed.

Documentation Associate
Turns spoken updates into structured, professional notes in seconds.

HR Associate
Your AI HR manager. Runs hiring to onboarding as one conversation.

CFO Associate
Your digital CFO. Shows exactly where money is leaking and what to fix.

Rostering Associate
Always-on rostering assistant that fills shift gaps in minutes, not hours.
1 / 4
Book a 30-minute walkthrough. Our product experts will look at your stack, confirm which connectors are live and set up James with you.
James is Curki's dedicated regulatory and incident compliance associate. It continuously reviews incident logs, complaints and shift notes to detect unreported risks, check documentation against NDIS and aged care standards, and generate audit-ready evidence for investigations, governance and funding reviews.

Watch the walkthrough, then get set up in four steps. Connections are API-first and read-only by default, and most teams connect a system in about 3 minutes once credentials are ready.
Sign up at Curki.ai and verify your email.
Paste an API key or complete OAuth for your progress notes system and incident or risk register, plus complaints if you want them. Read-only is recommended.
Set incident categories and severity levels, reportable definitions, corrective action fields and who is alerted when.
Open Incident Management & Auditing. New notes and incidents are reviewed on each refresh, with Needs Review alerts and unreported incident candidates.
Stuck on scopes or ID mapping? Book a free 30-minute session and our product experts will onboard you end to end. Book a walkthrough
Compliance managers sample notes, chase incomplete incidents and reconstruct timelines by hand. Incidents get missed until families complain or audits find gaps, and corrective actions are inconsistent.
James flags potential reportables, missing follow-ups and unreported incidents automatically. You get a ready-to-review timeline, a draft evidence summary and corrective action prompts, so your team stays proactive, not reactive.
“Don't wait for an audit to find your gaps. Let AI audit everything, all the time, and give your team only the exceptions worth reviewing.”
For example, a fall mentioned in a progress note with no formal incident created.
Weeks of note-hunting become a clear, chronological timeline of who, what and when.
Risk trends by participant, house or site, shift type, day and time, and staff cohort.
Early warning signals like behavioural triggers, medication refusals and repeated near-misses.
Identify documentation gaps and training needs. System improvement, not blame.
Every record reviewed, not a 5–10% sample, with human review where it matters.
Module 01
Flags potential reportable incidents based on your configured definitions, prompts for missing required fields and tracks follow-ups and corrective actions.
Module 02
Cross-checks shift notes against the incident register, surfaces risk patterns and assembles evidence summaries and timelines for audits and reviews.
What James can do for your team.
01
Cross-checks shift and progress notes against the incident register for events that were never recorded.
05
Detects trends in falls, medication refusal, behaviours of concern and skin integrity by participant, site and time.
09
Trend summaries and risk heatmaps for governance packs.
02
Prompts for missing required fields: time, location, immediate actions, witnesses and escalation.
06
Flags language that may indicate restrictive practices for review against your policy.
03
Collates relevant notes into a structured narrative of who, what, when, impact and actions.
07
Connects complaint themes with incident patterns to separate systemic issues from isolated events.
04
Builds a chronological timeline across notes, incidents, communications and actions.
08
Spots repeated gaps like missing detail, late notes or missing immediate actions to inform coaching.
Group 1 of 3
Scenario 01
A worker writes “client slipped in shower” in shift notes. James finds no matching incident entry and alerts the quality manager to review and lodge appropriately.
Scenario 02
For a plan review, James scans a defined period and compiles a structured chronology of behaviours, risks, escalation and interventions, ready for internal review.
Scenario 03
Skin tears spike on weekends at one house. James highlights the trend so you can investigate staffing mix, handover quality, hazards or training gaps.
“The note says ‘client was upset’, but there are indicators of verbal aggression. Do you want this flagged as a potential behavioural incident for review?”
“Incident #123 has no follow-up date or immediate action recorded. This may block closure. Please add before finalising.”
James flags potential risks and asks for confirmation rather than asserting conclusions.
It prepares drafts and checks completeness. A person reviews and submits to external portals.
Highlights compliance risks but doesn't determine liability.
Flags symptoms and keywords; never diagnoses medical causes.
If information is missing, James asks for it.
Quality and compliance managers, operations managers, team leaders and CEOs of NDIS and aged care providers (typically 20+ participants) who need audit-ready governance and time-bound incident control.
Providers with paper-only shift notes and incident logs, or organisations unwilling to standardise incident workflows.
No. It audits and augments your existing system, linking incident records with shift notes and related evidence so your team can act faster and more consistently.
It scans shift notes for incident indicators such as falls, injuries, aggression, medication refusal or ambulance attendance, and checks whether a matching entry exists in your incident register.
No. It helps you prepare and validate the content, but submission always remains a human-controlled step.
Yes. Definitions, keywords, severity thresholds and required fields can be configured to match your governance framework.
It can support SIRS-style categorisation and prompts where configured. We'll confirm your exact decision-tree requirements during onboarding.
Items are flagged as “needs review” and James asks for clarification rather than auto-labelling. You can tune the rules over time.
Yes. If voice-generated notes are stored in your connected system, James audits them like any other shift note.
Yes. It normalises and structures text for detection and summarisation, then asks for missing details where needed.

Documentation Associate
Turns spoken updates into structured, professional notes in seconds.

HR Associate
Your AI HR manager. Runs hiring to onboarding as one conversation.

CFO Associate
Your digital CFO. Shows exactly where money is leaking and what to fix.

Rostering Associate
Always-on rostering assistant that fills shift gaps in minutes, not hours.
1 / 4
Book a 30-minute walkthrough. Our product experts will look at your stack, confirm which connectors are live and set up James with you.